GAUSSIAN SPLATTING FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE DIGITIZATION: TECHNICAL POSITIONING, APPLICATION SCENARIOS, AND FUTURE PROSPECTS
Keywords:
Gaussian splatting, Cultural heritage digitization, Three-dimensional reconstruction, Neural rendering, Virtual museums, Digital cultural tourism, Heritage visualizationAbstract
Cultural heritage digitization is increasingly shifting from static geometric recording toward immersive, interactive, and scene-based representation. Within this technological transformation, Gaussian Splatting has emerged as a promising approach for image-driven three-dimensional visualization, offering photorealistic rendering, spatial continuity, and real-time free-viewpoint navigation. This article examines the role of Gaussian Splatting in cultural heritage digitization by situating it within the broader evolution from manual modeling, laser scanning, photogrammetry, and SfM-MVS reconstruction to neural rendering. It argues that Gaussian Splatting should be understood primarily as a rendering-oriented scene representation rather than as a substitute for measurement-oriented point clouds, mesh models, BIM/HBIM, or GIS-based heritage information systems. On this basis, the article discusses its potential applications in architectural heritage, archaeological sites, caves and grottoes, museum collections, virtual museums, and digital cultural tourism. It further analyzes key methodological stages, including data acquisition, pose estimation, Gaussian representation and optimization, quality evaluation, semantic segmentation, multi-source fusion, and platform deployment. While Gaussian Splatting provides strong advantages in visual realism and interactive access, its limitations in geometric measurability, semantic organization, long-term interoperability, and conservation-grade documentation must be carefully addressed. The article concludes that the future value of Gaussian Splatting lies not in replacing established digitization methods, but in connecting visual scenes with measurement data, semantic annotation, archival systems, and public-facing platforms, thereby contributing to more integrated, accessible, and sustainable cultural heritage digital infrastructures.References
[1] Remondino F. Heritage Recording and 3D Modeling with Photogrammetry and 3D Scanning. Remote Sensing, 2011, 3(6): 1104-1138.
[2] Kerbl B, Kopanas G, Leimkühler T, et al. 3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2023, 42(4): 139: 1-139:14.
[3] Mildenhall B, Srinivasan P P, Tancik M, et al. NeRF: Representing Scenes as Neural Radiance Fields for View Synthesis. Communications of the ACM, 2022, 65(1): 99-106.
[4] Kwon O, Yu J. Realistic and Interactive Virtual Museum Representation Using 3D Gaussian Splatting. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2025, X-M-2-2025: 185-192.
[5] Schönberger J L, Frahm J M. Structure-from-Motion Revisited. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016: 4104-4113.
[6] Lowe D G. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 60(2): 91-110.
[7] Khedr M, Metawie M, Eldin A S, et al. 3D Visualization of Damaged Statues Using Gaussian Splatting and Web Interface Integration. npj Heritage Science, 2025, 13(1): 587.
[8] Pan Y H, Guo M, Kong Y J, et al. The Current State and Future Prospects of 3D Digitization in Cultural Heritage. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2026. DOI: 10.12082/ dqxxkx.2026.260078
[9] Besl P J, McKay N D. A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1992, 14(2): 239-256.