PROTECTION WITHOUT EMPLOYMENT: THE POLICY LOGIC, IMPLEMENTATION, AND REFORM OF CHINA’S OCCUPATIONAL INJURY PROTECTION PILOT FOR PLATFORM WORKERS

Authors

  • ShiYing Jing (Corresponding Author) School of Environment, Education and Development, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom.

Keywords:

Occupational injury, Platform work, Gig economy, Social protection, China, Policy experimentation, Work-injury insurance, New forms of employment

Abstract

China hosts the world’s largest platform workforce: roughly 84 million people in “new forms of employment”, most of them outside standard labour law and the employment-based work-injury insurance that depends on it. Since 2022 the Chinese state has answered with a distinctive instrument, a status-neutral occupational injury protection scheme funded by platforms through a small charge on every order and triggered by the work rather than by an employment relationship. This article evaluates that pilot. It reconstructs the policy logic, reading the scheme as a case of Chinese policy experimentation that deliberately decouples social protection from employment status. It documents the design and the 2022 to 2026 implementation, during which the pilot grew from seven provinces to seventeen, lifted enrollment from 8.9 to 25.1 million, and set a course for nationwide coverage in 2026. It places the scheme in international perspective and finds no close analogue for its per-order, platform-funded, mandatory model. It then identifies the gaps that remain, namely single-risk coverage, thin evidence on claims and adequacy, unresolved worker status, weak portability, and the fragility of the move from pilot to permanent institution, and the reform pathways each implies. The pilot shows that social protection can be decoupled from employment and funded at the level of the transaction. Whether it becomes a durable, portable, multi-risk floor will be decided in the scaling and legislation now under way.

References

[1] All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU). The ninth national survey of the workforce: 84 million workers in new forms of employment. 2023. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2023-03/27/content_5748417.htm.

[2] Vallas S, Schor JB. What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 2020, 46(1): 273-294.

[3] Zhan J, Li Y, Zhao Y. More reliance, more injuries: Income dependence, workload and work injury of online food-delivery platform riders. Safety Science, 2023, 167: 106264.

[4] Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and ten other departments. Notice on Launching the Pilot Programme for Occupational Injury Protection of Workers in New Forms of Employment. Beijing: MOHRSS, 2021.

[5] Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and eight other departments. Notice on Expanding the Pilot Programme for Occupational Injury Protection of Workers in New Forms of Employment (Renshebufa [2025] No. 24). 2025. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202507/content_7031656.htm.

[6] Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security. Regular press conference on human resources and social security work, 27 January. 2026. http://society.people.com.cn/n1/2026/0127/c1008-40653735.html.

[7] State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Report on the Work of the Government. Beijing: State Council, 2025.

[8] State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Report on the Work of the Government. Beijing: State Council, 2026.

[9] International Labour Organization. Pilot Programme on Occupational Injury Insurance for Workers in New Forms of Employment. Good Practices in Social Security in China No. 3. Geneva: International Labour Office, 2025.

[10] Heilmann S. Policy Experimentation in China’s Economic Rise. Studies in Comparative International Development, 2008, 43(1): 1-26.

[11] Behrendt C, Nguyen QA, Rani U. Social protection systems and the future of work: Ensuring social security for digital platform workers. International Social Security Review, 2019, 72(3): 17-41.

[12] Sun P. Your order, their labor: An exploration of algorithms and laboring on food delivery platforms in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 2019, 12(3): 308-323.

[13] Huang H. Algorithmic management in food‐delivery platform economy in China. New Technology, Work and Employment, 2022, 38(2): 185-205.

[14] Kellogg KC, Valentine MA, Christin A. Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control. Academy of Management Annals, 2020, 14(1): 366-410.

[15] Sun P, Yujie Chen J, Rani U. From Flexible Labour to ‘Sticky Labour’: A Tracking Study of Workers in the Food-Delivery Platform Economy of China. Work, Employment and Society, 2021, 37(2): 412-431.

[16] Zheng Q, Zhan J, Feng X. Working safety and workloads of Chinese delivery riders: the role of work pressure. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2022, 29(2): 869-882.

[17] Quy Nguyen-Phuoc D, An Ngoc Nguyen N, Nguyen MH, et al. Factors influencing road safety compliance among food delivery riders: An extension of the job demands-resources (JD-R) model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2022, 166: 541-556.

[18] Qian Q, He J, Shi J. Analysis of factors influencing aberrant riding behavior of food delivery riders: A perspective on safety attitude and risk perception. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2023, 100: 273-288.

[19] McKinlay A, Mitchell G, Bertenshaw C. Review article: DINED (Delivery‐related INjuries in the Emergency Department) part 1: A scoping review of risk factors and injuries affecting food delivery riders. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 2022, 34(2): 150-156.

[20] Vignola EF, Baron S, Abreu Plasencia E, et al. Workers’ Health under Algorithmic Management: Emerging Findings and Urgent Research Questions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023, 20(2): 1239.

[21] Salmon PM, KC B, Irwin BG, et al. What influences gig economy delivery rider behaviour and safety? a systems analysis. Safety Science, 2023, 166: 106263.

[22] Tran NAT, Nguyen HLA, Nguyen TBH, et al. Health and safety risks faced by delivery riders during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Transport & Health, 2022, 25: 101343.

[23] Mao AL, Tian CM, Liu CX. The association between workloads and health hazard among delivery riders in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 2025, 13.

[24] Huang H. Riders on the Storm: Amplified Platform Precarity and the Impact of COVID-19 on Online Food-delivery Drivers in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 2021, 31(135): 351-365.

[25] Wang T, Cooke FL. Internet Platform Employment in China : Legal Challenges and Implications for Gig Workers through the Lens of Court Decisions. Relations industrielles / Industrial Relations, 2021, 76(3): 541-564.

[26] Zheng Q, Su J. Subordination Theory in Practice: An Empirical Analysis of Chinese Courts’ Approaches to Classifying Labour Relationships in Platform Cases. Industrial Law Journal, 2023, 52(3): 721-750.

[27] Feng X, Cooke FL, Zhao C. Fragmentation of employment relationships, fragmentation of working time: the nature of work and employment of platform takeaway riders and implications for decent work in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 2024, 62(2).

[28] Yang B. Balancing flexibility and stability: The role of outsourced service stations in managing food‐delivery platform work in China. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 2024, 63(4): 530-551.

[29] Ke Z. A Third Employment Category for Platform Workers in China: A Tough Start. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 2022, 10(2): 297-322.

[30] Xie Z. Labour Protection of Platform Workers in China: Legal Innovations and Emerging Trends. Industrial Law Journal, 2022, 51(4): 831-854.

[31] Tian Y, Chen Y, Zhou M, et al. Institutional Design and Incentives for Migrant Workers to Participate in Social Insurance in China: Evidence From a Policy Experiment in Chengdu City. Frontiers in Public Health, 2021, 9.

[32] Ran X, Zhao Y. Behind the flexibility: insufficient occupational injury protection of gig workers in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 2023, 11.

[33] Tsai WH, Dean N. Experimentation under Hierarchy in Local Conditions: Cases of Political Reform in Guangdong and Sichuan, China. The China Quarterly, 2014, 218: 339-358.

[34] Teets JC, Hasmath R. The evolution of policy experimentation in China. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 2020, 13(1): 49-59.

[35] Heffer AS, Schubert G. Policy Experimentation under Pressure in Contemporary China. The China Quarterly, 2023, 253: 35-56.

[36] Wang S, Yang DY. Policy Experimentation in China: The Political Economy of Policy Learning. Journal of Political Economy, 2025, 133(7): 2180-2228.

[37] Song Y, Li Y. How are policy pilots managed? Findings from the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China. Journal of Public Policy, 2023, 44(1): 143-163.

[38] Song Y, Li Y. Upscaling policy pilots: Four tales in Chinese health governance. Public Policy and Administration, 2024, 41(2): 202-222.

[39] Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security. Exploration, practice and prospects: a review of the occupational injury protection pilot for workers in new forms of employment. 2024. https://chinajob.mohrss.gov.cn/c/2024-10-10/416112.shtml.

[40] Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security. The expansion of the occupational injury protection pilot was launched on 1 July. 2025. https://chinajob.mohrss.gov.cn/h5/c/2025-07-08/442703.shtml.

[41] Zhang H, Liu K. Can a voluntarist approach to social security extend protection to gig workers? Evidence from the platform-based food-delivery sector in China. Journal of Industrial Relations, 2024, 67(1): 101-129.

[42] Wu X, Wang J, Jiang J. Insurance and the gig economy: Analyzing Chinese platform workers’ participation in work-related injury insurance. Acta Psychologica, 2025, 256: 105016.

[43] Du Q, Miao X, Cui X, et al. Study on policy adaptability of occupational injury insurance for employees of emerging business sectors in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 2025, 13.

[44] Du W, Wang X. New forms of employment and labour protection in China. ILO Working Paper. Geneva: International Labour Organization, 2024.

[45] Sieker F. Platform work and access to social protection across major European countries. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 2022, 38(3): 193-207.

[46] Daugareilh I. Introduction: Social protection for digital platform workers in Europe. International Social Security Review, 2021, 74(3-4): 5-12.

[47] Jacqueson C. Platform work, social protection and flexicurity in Denmark. International Social Security Review, 2021, 74(3-4): 39-59.

[48] Immervoll H, Fernandez R, Hyee R, et al. De-facto gaps in social protection for standard and non-standard workers. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2022.

[49] Seekings J. The limits to ‘global’ social policy: The ILO, the social protection floor and the politics of welfare in East and Southern Africa. Global Social Policy, 2019, 19(1-2): 139-158.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

ShiYing Jing. Protection Without Employment: The Policy Logic, Implementation, And Reform Of China’s Occupational Injury Protection Pilot For Platform Workers. Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities Research. 2026, 4(4): 60-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/tsshr3238.