EFFICACY OF A THORACOLUMBAR ACTIVE RESISTANCE REHABILITATION TRAINER VERSUS TRADITIONAL BRIDGE EXERCISES IN SPINAL CORD INJURY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Authors

  • MeiLing Cheng Rehabilitation Medicine Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, China. Department of Spine Surgery, Beijing Bo’ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China.
  • FangYong Wang (Corresponding Author) Rehabilitation Medicine Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, China. Department of Spine Surgery, Beijing Bo’ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China. School of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100068, China.

Keywords:

Spinal cord injury, Active rehabilitation, Bridge exercise, Spinal cord independence measure

Abstract

Objective: A thoracolumbar active resistance rehabilitation trainer was developed, aiming to verify its activation effect on the core muscles of the lumbar and abdominal regions in spinal cord injury (SCI) cases and explore the difference in therapeutic efficacy between this trainer and traditional bridge exercises. Methods: A prospective, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial of 40 SCI inpatients. Participants were allocated to two groups, both alongside conventional rehabilitation. The experimental group received 8 weeks of training with the trainer, while the control group underwent 8 weeks of bridge exercises training. The assessment indicators include surface electromyography, Spinal Cord Independence Measure-III, Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores. Results: The experimental group demonstrated superior abdominal muscle activation versus controls at 8 weeks. Clinically, the experimental group showed greater improvement in functional independence (t=2.599, P=0.019, Cohen'd=1.225), exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Both groups achieved MCID in walking ability (WISCI) and lumbar function (JOA), with no significant between-group differences. The trainer was safe and rated higher for convenience and usability. Conclusion: The trainer is safe and more effective than bridge exercises for functional independence in SCI rehabilitation, offering practical advantages for diverse settings.

References

[1] Anjum A, Yazid MD, Fauzi Daud M, et al. Spinal Cord Injury: Pathophysiology, Multimolecular Interactions, and Underlying Recovery Mechanisms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020, 21(20): 7533. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21207533.

[2] Barbiellini Amidei C, Salmaso L, Bellio S, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury: a large population-based study. Spinal Cord, 2022, 60(9): 812-819. DOI: 10.1038/s41393-022-00795-w.

[3] Martin Ginis KA, van der Scheer JW, Latimer-Cheung AE, et al. Evidence-based scientific exercise guidelines for adults with spinal cord injury: an update and a new guideline. Spinal Cord, 2018, 56(4): 308-321. DOI: 10.1038/s41393-017-0017-3.

[4] Harvey LA. Physiotherapy rehabilitation for people with spinal cord injuries. Journal of Physiotherapy, 2016, 62(1): 4-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.11.004.

[5] Okhiria M, Truszczyńska-Baszak A, Tarnowski A. Assessment of work-related fatigue in Polish physiotherapists and of its effect on their diagnostic accuracy and physiotherapy planning. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2020, 26(2): 406-412. DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2019.1690215.

[6] Bin L, Wang X, Jiatong H, et al. The effect of robot-assisted gait training for patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2023, 17: 1252651. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1252651.

[7] Traeger AC, Gilbert SE, Harris IA, et al. Spinal cord stimulation for low back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2023, 3(3): CD014789. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014789.pub2.

[8] Levett JJ, Elkaim LM, Niazi F, et al. Invasive Brain Computer Interface for Motor Restoration in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review. Neuromodulation, 2024, 27(4): 597-603. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.10.006.

[9] Gil-Agudo Á, Megía-García Á, Pons JL, et al. Exoskeleton-based training improves walking independence in incomplete spinal cord injury patients: results from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2023, 20(1): 36. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01158-z.

[10] Oliva-Lozano JM, Muyor JM. Core Muscle Activity during Physical Fitness Exercises: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(12): 4306. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17124306.

[11] Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 2007, 39(2): 175-91. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193146.

[12] Harkema SJ, Schmidt-Read M, Lorenz DJ, et al. Balance and ambulation improvements in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury using locomotor training-based rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2012, 93(9): 1508-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.024.

[13] Unai K, Uemura O, Takemura R, et al. Association Between SCIM III Total Scores and Individual Item Scores to Predict Independence With ADLs in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation, 2019, 1(3-4): 100029. DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2019.100029.

[14] Sinovas-Alonso I, Herrera-Valenzuela D, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, et al. Application of the Gait Deviation Index to Study Gait Impairment in Adult Population With Spinal Cord Injury: Comparison With the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury Levels. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2022, 16: 826333. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.826333.

[15] Lu Z, Ding A, Yu Q, et al. Effect of the preoperative assessment of the anteroposterior diameters of the spinal canal and dural area on the efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2023, 18(1): 440. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03913-3.

[16] Scivoletto G, Tamburella F, Laurenza L, et al. The spinal cord independence measure: how much change is clinically significant for spinal cord injury subjects. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2013, 35(21): 1808-13. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.756942.

[17] Nagoshi N, Yamane J, Okubo T, et al. Impact of Symptom Duration on Surgical Outcomes and Functional Recovery in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Insights from a Prospective Multicenter Study. Spine, 2025. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005515.

[18] Hornby TG, Plawecki A, Lotter J, et al. Higher Intensity Walking Training in Individuals With Chronic Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2025, 27: 15459683251399158. DOI: 10.1177/15459683251399158.

[19] Wang S, Miao S, Zhuang P, et al. Assessment of surface electromyographic clinical analysis of selective femoral neurotomy on cerebral palsy with stiff knee. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2011, 199(1): 98–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.04.031.

[20] Pankheaw T, Hiengkaew V, Bovonsunthonchai S, et al. Effect of progressive bridging exercise on weight-bearing during the extension phase of sit-to-stand, and on sit-to-stand ability in individuals with stroke: A randomised controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 2022, 36(11): 1463-1475. DOI: 10.1177/02692155221107107.

[21] Cholewicki J, Panjabi MM, Khachatryan A. Stabilizing function of trunk flexor-extensor muscles around a neutral spine posture. Spine, 1997, 22: 2207–2212. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199710010-00003.

[22] Huang D, Wang Z, Dekhne M, et al. Balance or Strength? Reconsidering Muscle Metrics in Sagittal Malalignment in Adult Sagittal Deformity Patients. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025, 14(10): 3293. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14103293.

[23] Gil-Agudo Á, Megía-García Á, Pons JL, et al. Exoskeleton-based training improves walking independence in incomplete spinal cord injury patients: results from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2023, 20(1): 36. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01158-z.

[24] Edwards DJ, Forrest G, Cortes M, et al. Walking improvement in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury with exoskeleton robotic training (WISE): a randomized controlled trial. Spinal Cord, 2022, 60(6): 522-532. DOI: 10.1038/s41393-022-00751-8.

[25] Karthikbabu S, Verheyden G. Relationship between trunk control, core muscle strength and balance confidence in community-dwelling patients with chronic stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2021, 28(2): 88-95. DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1783896.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

MeiLing Cheng, FangYong Wang. Efficacy Of A Thoracolumbar Active Resistance Rehabilitation Trainer Versus Traditional Bridge Exercises In Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eurasia Journal of Science and Technology. 2026, 8(3): 75-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/ejst3155.