DIGITAL-INTELLIGENT PENETRATING SUPERVISION AND DATA ASSET AUDIT RISK EARLY WARNING: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON LISTED ELECTRONIC INFORMATION FIRMS IN SICHUAN PROVINCE

Authors

  • YongHui Li School of Digital Economy and Management, Sichuan University of Technology and Business, Meishan 620000, Sichuan, China.
  • HaiBo Zhang (Corresponding Author) School of Digital Economy and Management, Sichuan University of Technology and Business, Meishan 620000, Sichuan, China.

Keywords:

Data asset audit, Audit risk early warning, Digital-intelligent penetrating supervision, Machine learning, Electronic information industry, Sichuan province

Abstract

The digital economy has elevated data assets to a strategic corporate resource, yet their unique characteristics — non-rivalry, value volatility, and valuation ambiguity — introduce unprecedented audit risks. This study develops a novel theoretical framework integrating Digital-Intelligent Penetrating Supervision (DIPS) theory with audit risk assessment to construct a data asset audit risk early warning system for listed electronic information firms in Sichuan Province, China. Using panel data from 38 listed electronic information companies in Sichuan from 2023 to 2025, we propose a hybrid machine learning model combining XGBoost with SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) interpretability to identify and predict data asset audit risk factors. Our empirical results reveal that (1) data asset valuation uncertainty, regulatory compliance intensity, and internal data governance maturity are the three most significant predictors of audit risk; (2) the proposed XGBoost-SHAP model achieves an AUC of 0.937, outperforming traditional logistic regression (0.781) and random forest (0.892) benchmarks; (3) firms with higher digital supervision maturity exhibit significantly lower data asset audit risk, with a marginal effect of -0.183. This study contributes to the audit literature by operationalizing the DIPS framework in the context of data asset auditing and providing a practically deployable early warning tool. Our findings have direct implications for audit practitioners, regulators, and listed companies navigating the complex landscape of data asset assurance in emerging economies.

References

[1] Liu Y, Zhang W, Chen X. Data asset recognition and financial reporting quality: Evidence from China's A-share market. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2025, 44(3): 106-128.

[2] Wang J, Li H, Zhou F. The valuation of data assets: Challenges and approaches in the digital economy. The Accounting Review, 2025, 100(2): 189-215.

[3] Sichuan Provincial Department of Economy and Information Technology. Annual report on the development of electronic information industry in Sichuan Province. Chengdu: SDEIT Press, 2025.

[4] Xie G, Huang Y, Wu Y, et al. Data asset audit risk and audit response: A literature review. China Journal of Accounting Research, 2025, 18(4): 84-91.

[5] Zhang J, Wang J, Li S. Audit risks of data resources recognized as inventory and intangible assets: A comparative analysis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 2025, 44(3): 67-89.

[6] Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of China. Interim provisions on accounting treatment of enterprise data resources (Cai Kuai [2023] No. 11). Beijing: MOF, 2023.

[7] European Securities and Markets Authority. ESMA supervisory priorities for 2026: Data-driven supervision and AI-powered tools. Paris: ESMA, 2025.

[8] Chen L, Wang Y. Penetrating supervision in the digital age: Theory and practice in Chinese financial regulation. Journal of Financial Regulation, 2025, 11(2): 156-178.

[9] Bao Y, Ke B, Li B, et al. Machine learning in audit risk assessment: A comprehensive review and research agenda. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2025, 42(1): 234-267.

[10] Chen T, Huang Y, Lin S. Gradient boosting machines for financial statement fraud detection: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Accounting Research, 2025, 63(2): 445-478.

[11] Bao Y, Li B, Yu Y. Detecting material misstatement risk using ensemble learning methods. The Accounting Review, 2025, 100(1): 123-156.

[12] Sutton S G, Holt M, Arnold V. The challenge of interpretability in AI-augmented auditing. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2025, 46: 100-123.

[13] Lundberg S M, Lee S I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions with SHAP. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2025, 7(3): 245-258.

[14] Li X, Zheng Y, Wu D. RegTech adoption and audit quality: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2025, 72: 102-145.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-17

Issue

Section

Research Article

DOI:

How to Cite

YongHui Li, HaiBo Zhang. Digital-Intelligent Penetrating Supervision And Data Asset Audit Risk Early Warning: An Empirical Study On Listed Electronic Information Firms In Sichuan Province. World Journal of Information Technology. 2026, 4(5): 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjit3115.