ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ENABLED DIGITAL GOVERNANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: OPERATING MECHANISMS, RISK BOUNDARIES, AND AN ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK
Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Digital governance, Higher education, Adaptive governance, Algorithmic accountabilityAbstract
Artificial intelligence is increasingly becoming a part of the governance of universities. While there has been a significant amount of research discussing the applications of artificial intelligence in higher education and the ethics of artificial intelligence, there has been less discussion of how artificial intelligence impacts the governance of universities. This article reviews 36 sources relating to artificial intelligence and higher education to develop a framework for understanding artificial intelligence-enabled digital governance in higher education. The article identifies four mechanisms through which artificial intelligence functions within higher education governance: data-driven sensing, cognitive augmentation in decision-making, coordinated execution, and recursive institutional learning. These mechanisms create risks for higher education institutions, including data extraction and purpose drift, algorithmic bias and opacity, automation dependence and responsibility diffusion, and misalignment with educational values. To manage these risks, the article develops an adaptive governance framework that includes risk-tiered authorization, impact assessment, human oversight, decision logging, audit, contestability, and institutional updating. The framework is applied to major university functions. The article argues against the use of artificial intelligence as an autonomous decision maker in higher education and against presenting artificial intelligence as a neutral productivity device. The article suggests that the appropriate role for artificial intelligence in higher education is to strengthen institutional judgment within a dual closed loop of feedback. This article contributes to the field of digital governance and provides a framework through which universities may use artificial intelligence while protecting student rights, academic values, and public trust in higher education.References
[1] Bullock J B. Artificial Intelligence, Discretion, and Bureaucracy. The American Review of Public Administration, 2019, 49(7): 751-761. DOI: 10.1177/0275074019856123.
[2] Mergel I, Edelmann N, Haug N. Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 2019, 36: 101385. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002.
[3] Sun T Q, Medaglia R. Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Government Information Quarterly, 2019, 36: 368-383. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008.
[4] Wirtz B W, Weyerer J C, Geyer C. Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 2019, 42: 596-615. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103.
[5] Zuiderwijk A, Chen Y C, Salem F. Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 2021, 38: 101577. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577.
[6] Ouyang F, Zheng L, Jiao P. Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 2022, 27: 7893-7925. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9.
[7] Zawacki-Richter O, Marín V I, Bond M, et al. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2019, 16: 39. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0.
[8] Kasneci E, Sessler K, Küchemann S, et al. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 2023, 103: 102274. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.
[9] Holmes W, Porayska-Pomsta K, Holstein K, et al. Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2022, 32: 504-526. DOI: 10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1.
[10] Williamson B, Eynon R. Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 2020, 45: 1-13. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995.
[11] Humble N. Higher Education AI Policies—A Document Analysis of University Guidelines. European Journal of Education, 2025, 60: e70214. DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70214.
[12] Floridi L, Cowls J, Beltrametti M, et al. AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations. Minds and Machines, 2018, 28: 689-707. DOI: 10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.
[13] Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2019, 1: 389-399. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.
[14] Rahwan I. Society-in-the-loop: programming the algorithmic social contract. Ethics and Information Technology, 2018, 20: 5-14. DOI: 10.1007/s10676-017-9430-8.
[15] Janssen M, Van Der Voort H. Agile and adaptive governance in crisis response: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information Management, 2020, 55: 102180. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102180.
[16] Gasser U, Almeida V A F. A Layered Model for AI Governance. IEEE Internet Computing, 2017, 21: 58-62. DOI: 10.1109/MIC.2017.4180835.
[17] Khosravi H, Shum S B, Chen G, et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2022, 3: 100074. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100074.
[18] Baker R S, Hawn A. Algorithmic Bias in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2022, 32: 1052-1092. DOI: 10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9.
[19] Pardo A, Siemens G. Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2014, 45: 438-450. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12152.
[20] Selbst A D, Boyd D, Friedler S A, et al. Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Atlanta, GA, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019: 59-68. DOI: 10.1145/3287560.3287598.
[21] De Fine Licht K, De Fine Licht J. Artificial intelligence, transparency, and public decision-making. AI & SOCIETY, 2020, 35: 917-926. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-020-00960-w.
[22] Kroll J A, Huey J, Barocas S, et al. Accountable Algorithms. Social Science Electronic Publishing, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2016, 165: 633-705.
[23] Raji I D, Smart A, White R N, et al. Closing the AI accountability gap: defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Barcelona, Spain: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020: 33-44. DOI: 10.1145/3351095.3372873.
[24] Coates H, Croucher G, Calderon A. Governing Academic Integrity: Ensuring the Authenticity of Higher Thinking in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2025, 23: 2015-2028. DOI: 10.1007/s10805-025-09639-7.
[25] Yeung K. Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 2018, 12: 505-523. DOI: 10.1111/rego.12158.
[26] Tlili A, Shehata B, Adarkwah M A, et al. What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 2023, 10: 15. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x.
[27] Chan C K Y. A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2023, 20: 38. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3.
[28] Isaifan R J, Hasna M O. Artificial intelligence for quality assurance in higher education: a policy-to-practice model from Qatar with global relevance. Quality in Higher Education, 2025, 31: 288-303. DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2025.2576326.
[29] Alfiras M I I, Emran A Q, Mohamed A M. Ethics and governance of generative AI in education: a systematic review on responsible adoption. Discover Education, 2025, 5: 37. DOI: 10.1007/s44217-025-01051-y.